THE FOUNDATION OF THE PROMISE (GAL
3:15-18)
SERIES: FREE AT LAST, PART 10
GCEFC: JANUARY 3, 2010
INTRODUCTION
1. Today we resume our study in the Book of Galatians. Paul has been
talking most of this chapter about Abraham, the father of the Jewish people. And
the prime example in the Bible of a person saved by the grace of God through
faith in God’s promise.
2.
Paul has just made the argument that even
though it may appear that Abraham was saved by being a good man, an obedient
man, and a keeper of God’s law—this was not the basis of his salvation.
3.
God told Abraham that even though he was a
very old man, and his wife was elderly, and they had been childless their
entire adult lives—that he was going to bless the entire human race through one
of his descendants.
4.
We’re told that Abraham believed this
highly unlikely promise of God. And because he believed God’s promise—God
declared him righteous—he was saved.
5.
Paul is countering the argument of the
false teachers who had convinced the Galatian Christians that their salvation
was not based on faith in Christ alone. But based on faith in Christ AND in
keeping the law of God.
6.
In the four verses we’re looking at this
morning, Paul continues his argument that salvation is by grace alone through
faith alone in Christ alone.
7.
His argument is not difficult to follow—but
it’s powerful and convincing.
A.
COVENANTS ARE UNCHANGEABLE
1.
V15: Brothers,
let me take an example from everyday life. Just as no one can set aside or add
to a human covenant that has been duly established, so it is in this case.
2.
One of the most effective and time-honored
ways of conveying knowledge is by comparing a well understood truth to a less
understood truth.
3.
Whether we call it an analogy, an illustration,
an example, a case in point, or a comparison, the method is very old, very
common, and very effective.
4.
Jesus employed this method repeatedly
through his use of parables. In his parables, Jesus took everyday, commonly
understood principles—and used them to help his hearers comprehend spiritual
truth that was not so commonly understood.
a. So he compared responses to the Word of God to the sowing of seed.
b. He compared obeying the Word of God to building a house on a firm
foundation.
c. He compared the joy in a sinner’s repentance to the finding of a
lost sheep.
d. He compared God’s love for his people to the love of a father for
his rebellious son.
e. He compared short-sighted perspective in life to a rich fool.
5. Paul, as a trained rabbi and a man of deep understanding of
spiritual truth, also used easily understood concepts to explain things that
were more obscure.
6. His first example is the concept of a covenant. We all know how a
covenant works. Generally, a covenant is a solemn promise to engage in or refrain
from a specified action.
7. A covenant is either conditional or unconditional. A conditional
covenant is an agreement that’s binding on both parties for its fulfillment.
Both parties agree to fulfill certain requirements or conditions.
8. An unconditional covenant is an agreement between two parties, but
only one of the two parties has a requirement to do something. Nothing is
required of the other party.
a. We can probably most relate to 3 kinds of covenants. One is a marriage
covenant. When a man and a woman (man and woman), promise certain things to
each other.
b. To have and to hold, for better for worse, for richer for poorer,
in sickness and health, to love, honor, comfort, cherish, and be faithful to
each other as long as they live.
c. A marriage covenant is conditional—something is required of both
parties.
d. Then there’s a mortgage covenant. Where you promise to send the
bank a certain amount of money each month for a certain amount of time. When
you complete your part of the covenant, the bank lifts the lien on the property
and it’s really yours.
e. Then there’s a last will and testament. In a will, the testator
leaves a written description of how they want their estate to be distributed
upon their death. A will is an unconditional covenant.
9.
The main point the verse makes is that you
can’t set aside or add to a covenant once it’s established. Though covenants
can be broken—they can’t be changed unilaterally.
10. You cannot change the marriage covenant you made with your spouse.
You can’t wake up one day and unilaterally remove the part about being
faithful.
11. If money gets tight, you can’t decide to send the bank only half
of your monthly mortgage payment. If you do, they can legally take the house
away from you.
12. And only the testator can change their will. The heirs can’t do
it. The lawyer can’t do it. And once the testator dies, no one can do it.
13. So, Paul is saying that just as with human covenants, they are set
and to be followed and honored by the parties who agree to them. You can’t take
away from them, you can’t add to them—you must honor them.
14. In the ancient world, there was a very specific way that covenants
were established.
a. When the two parties agreed on the terms, one or more animals were
slain and cut into two halves. This emphasized the solemnity of the covenant.
b. Then the halves of the animals were placed on opposite sides of a
path between them.
c. Then the 2 parties walked down the path between the animals,
sealing the agreement.
d. But when the Abrahamic Covenant was made, it was not your typical
agreement. Abraham did not make a covenant with God—God made a covenant with
Abraham.
e. The covenant was entirely one sided. There was nothing for Abraham
to do. There were no conditions for Abraham to meet. It was all about what God
would do.
f.
In fact, when it came time for God and
Abraham to walk between the animals to ratify the covenant—Abraham was asleep!
g. In GEN 15 we read: As the sun was setting, Abraham fell into a
deep sleep, and a thick and dreadful darkness came over him. When the sun had
set and darkness had fallen, a smoking firepot with a blazing torch appeared
and passed between the pieces. On that day the Lord made a covenant with
Abraham and said, ‘To your descendants I give this land…’
h. The smoking firepot was God
passing through the animals without
Abraham—symbolizing that this covenant was unconditional. God would keep
his part of the covenant fully—but there was no part for Abraham to keep.
15. Now, Paul is saying, if a human covenant is solemn and binding,
and cannot be altered after it’s set—then how
much more so with a covenant God himself initiates and seals with his own
Word and Name.
B.
THE PROMISE IS FULFILLED IN CHRIST
1.
So that’s Paul’s first illustration or
case in point. That any covenant God himself establishes is permanent and
reliable like no other covenant can ever be.
2.
We've been reminded that God’s covenant
with Abraham involved the promise of land. But it also included two other major
elements.
3.
The covenant God established with Abraham
was comprised of 3 main provisions.
a. A land
b. A seed
c. A blessing
4.
The land was Israel. The seed and the
blessing we’ll look at now.
5.
V16: The
promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. The Scripture does not say
‘and to seeds,’ meaning many people, but ‘and to your seed,’ meaning one
person, who is Christ.’
6.
We’re to understand that when God made a promise
to Abraham through his seed—he meant
seed in 3 ways.
a. First, God meant that the blessing would come through Abraham’s direct seed—that is—through Isaac, his son. The NIV translates the Hebrew for seed as offspring.
b. Second, God meant that the blessing would come to Abraham’s descendants—his seed or offspring, that
is, the children of Isaac onward.
c. Third, God meant that the blessing would come through one particular seed in the descendants
of Abraham—meaning Christ Jesus.
d. This is why the genealogy in MT
1 is so important. It reads: A record
of the genealogy of Jesus Christ the son of David, the son of Abraham.
7.
Paul makes a point of the word “seed” in V16. He’s trying to show that the
ultimate fulfillment of God’s promise to Abraham is not in the descendants of
Abraham generally, but through the one descendant, Christ, in particular.
8.
His argument is based on the singular vs.
the plural form of the word “seed.” He’s saying that if the promise was for the
many descendants of Abraham, it would have said seeds.
9.
Because it says seed, it refers to one person, that is—Christ. But this is a bit
problematic, because the word “seed” (as in offspring) is used for both
singular and plural.
10. It’s like our word “offspring.” I could say: Danny is my offspring, or Christina is my offspring, or Danny and
Christina are my offspring. Same word in every case.
11. Likewise, the word “seed” would have been used whether the
reference was to many offspring or to just one offspring.
12. We can be assured that Paul was aware that the Greek word for seed
meant singular or plural. The most probable explanation is that Paul wanted to
indicate that the singular was meant—and
that the word should be understood as singular in meaning.
13. It’s hard to know for certain because we can’t ask Paul. But his
words are inspired, and the point he’s making is clear enough.
14. The promise is to many physical
descendants of Abraham through Isaac. But the ultimate promise is to many spiritual descendants through Christ.
C.
IT’S AN UNCONDITIONAL PROMISE—NOT A REWARD
1.
V17: What
I mean is this: The law, introduced 430 years later, does not set aside the
covenant previously established by God and thus do away with the promise.
2.
He’s saying that God’s promise was free
and unconditional. There was nothing to do for it. No works to do, no laws to
obey, no merit to claim, no conditions to meet.
3.
God said: I will give you a seed. I will give this land to your seed. And through
your seed all people of the earth will be blessed.
4.
God’s promise was more like a will than a
covenant. It gave unconditional promises to a future generation that could not
be changed, altered, or annulled.
5.
In fact, V18: For if the inheritance
depends on the law, then it no longer depends on a promise; but God in his
grace gave it to Abraham through a promise.
6.
It’s as if the false teachers were saying
that the promise to Abraham was only temporary and that it was inferior.
7.
So 430 years later God introduced the
superior covenant of the law. This nullified the promise because the law was
superior to it.
8.
But Paul is saying NO WAY. How can the law set aside an unconditional covenant
established by God Himself?
9.
The law of God had an important purpose,
which we’ll see starting in V19, but
the law was never intended to replace
God’s unconditional promise to Abraham.
10. He’s saying that if God’s promise (the inheritance) depends on keeping
the law—then it’s not really a promise.
11. Suppose you were in line for an inheritance. And you go to the
reading of the will and the will
specifies that you are to inherit a piece of land and a house.
12. But when you go to sign the papers, you’re told that you’ll need
to work 40 hours a week for 30 years in order to receive the land and the house.
13. You’d say: WHAT? I
thought it was an inheritance. I thought it was a promise from my family. If I
have to work for it, then in what sense is it an unconditional inheritance?
14. Answer: IT’S NOT! If
the promise of future blessing through Christ, a descendant of Abraham, is an
unconditional promise of God’s grace—then it can’t be something that we earn,
merit, work for, or receive as payment for keeping the law.
15. V18: But God in his grace gave it to Abraham through a promise.
16. The greatest news you will ever hear, is that your salvation is a gift
of God, promised 4,000 years ago through an unconditional covenant with
Abraham, that you receive by virtue of your spiritual relationship to Abraham
by way of your spiritual relationship to Christ—who is the seed of Abraham.
17. God’s blessing to the world would not come through the descendants of Abraham, but through one descendant of Abraham—the man,
Christ Jesus, our Savior.
18. Salvation is by grace alone through faith alone. It was by grace
through faith before the law came. It was by grace through faith after the law
was introduced.
19. And our salvation remains by grace through faith to this day. In
Jesus Christ, the promise to Abraham finds its ultimate fulfillment.
20. This is why Paul ends the chapter with these words: If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s
seed, and heirs according to the promise.