MISSING THE BIG PICTURE (JN 11:45-48)
SERIES: ONE SOLITARY LIFE, PART 83
GCEFC: APRIL 26, 2009
INTRODUCTION
1. In our monthly communion series, One Solitary Life, we’ve been recently working our way through one
of the most extraordinary chapters in the Bible—John chapter 11.
2. Most of chapter 11 concerns the illness, death, and raising from
the dead of a man named Lazarus, who lived in Bethany near Jerusalem, and was a
close friend of Jesus.
3. Lazarus had become very sick, so his two sisters, Mary and Martha
had sent word to Jesus asking him to come to Bethany to minister to their
brother.
4. When Jesus first heard the news of Lazarus’ illness, he told his
disciples that they would stay on and minister where they were rather than going immediately to Lazarus.
5. It was a full day’s walk to Bethany. So between the day it took
the messenger to reach Jesus, and the 2 days he stayed after the message was
delivered. And the one day walk to Bethany—Lazarus had already been dead 4 days
when Jesus arrived.
6. Of course, Jesus knew that Lazarus had already died before they
set out for Bethany. But why did he linger? We don’t know for certain. But the
Jews believed that when a person died, their spirit hovered over the body for 3
days, trying to re-enter.
7. But once the body started to decompose, the spirit would not
re-enter. So by arriving in Bethany after Lazarus had been dead 4 days, there
would be no doubt that he was dead. And no doubt that a miracle had occurred
when he was raised.
8. So Jesus arrives in Bethany and everyone eventually meets up at
the tomb of Lazarus. There, in V43
Jesus calls to Lazarus: LAZARUS, COME
OUT!
9. And Lazarus came out of the tomb, with the grave wrappings still
clinging to his body. This would have been astonishing in the 1st
century just as it would be in the 21st.
A.
THE TYPICAL TWO RESPONSES
1. The words of Jesus and the miracles of Jesus always polarize
people into 2 camps. You either believe in him and trust him—or you disbelieve
him and reject him.
2. Some believe there’s a third choice. We’ll call it “the myth of
neutrality.” The idea that you can hold faith in suspension—neither believing
in Jesus nor not believing in him.
3. But think of it like a man drowning in the ocean and a rescue boat
comes by. The potential rescuers cry out: Do
you want to be saved from drowning?
a. The drowning man either responds: Yes, I do. Or: No I don’t. If
he says: You know, I’m not really sure at
the moment. I’m going to remain neutral on the issue for while and then decide.
b. So the rescue crew says: Okay,
whatever you wish. We’re going to head toward some other drowning people who
want to be rescued.
c. And the drowning man drowns. There’s no neutrality when you’re
drowning. Neither is there neutrality when you’re under God’s judgment and the
sentence of death.
4. That’s why Jesus states so clearly in JN 3:36: Whoever believes in
the Son has eternal life, but whoever rejects the Son will not see life, for
God’s wrath remains on him.
5. Remember that Jesus said in LU
11: He who is not with me is against
me. There is no neutrality when it comes to faith in Christ. Neutrality is
just a myth.
B.
THE SHORT SIGHTED SOLUTION
1. V45: Therefore, many of the Jews who had come
to visit Mary, and had seen what Jesus did, put their faith in him. One
of the possible responses to Jesus—belief.
2. V46: But some of them went to the Pharisees and
told them what Jesus had done. Then the chief priests and the Pharisees called
a meeting of the Sanhedrin.
3. This is the other possible
response. Unbelief, opposition, rebellion by those who reject Jesus’ words and miraculous works. No surprise there.
4. Every Jewish town had a sanhedrin, its governing body. But there
was only one Great Sanhedrin—the
body of chief priests,, religious aristocracy, Sadducees, and Pharisees—70 men
and headed by the High Priest.
5. The majority of the Sanhedrin was made up of Sadducees, the religious elite and wealthy. The Pharisees were the minority and less
affluent.
6. It’s unlikely that those who left the raising of Lazarus to go to
the Pharisees were going on an evangelistic campaign, or to tell them that they
were all wrong about Jesus.
7. They went because they were concerned about Jesus’ growing
influence and popularity with the people. And why was this a problem? We see in
V47 why it’s a problem.
8. V47: What are we accomplishing?” they asked.
‘Here is this man performing many wonderful miraculous signs. If we let him go
on like this, everyone will believe in him, and then the Romans will come and
take away both our place and our nation.
9. The Roman Empire had 2 very basic values. Complete loyalty to
Caesar, the Emperor. And peace throughout the empire.
10. When a person or movement became a threat to either the Emperor or
to peace in the empire, the response was certain—it was crushed without mercy.
There was no tolerance for sedition or rebellion in the empire.
11. So as Jesus became more popular and his deeds more extraordinary,
the religious leaders of Israel became increasingly concerned.
12. Their sentiment is expressed in the words of the Sanhedrin in V47: Here is this man performing many miraculous signs. If we let him go on
like this, everyone will believe in him, and then the Romans will come and take
away both our place and our nation.
13. Their very real fear was that Jesus would be seen as a threat to
the Emperor himself. Remember, Jesus claimed to be a king.
14. And—he would be seen as a threat to the peace because as people
flocked to him and responded to his claims, disturbances were inevitable.
15. If it got out of hand, Rome would respond in its typical ruthless
way. First, the Temple would be confiscated or destroyed because it unified the
people.
16. And the nation itself would lose its Rome-sanctioned autonomy.
Israel was able to more or less govern itself because Rome permitted it. Kind
of like you as a parent letting your child have some jurisdiction over his own
room. It’s a granted privilege—not a right.
17. Of course, with either or both of these things removed, the
Sanhedrin would be about as meaningful as Confederate war bonds. No power, no
significance, and no authority.
18. It would spell the end of what remained of the once world power
known as Israel. Their concern was very real. In fact, as you know, in less
than 40 years after this speech, that very thing happened.
19. Their solution to the problem was very practical and very
expedient. They would prevent Rome from having to come in and wipe them off the
face of the map by getting rid of Jesus—the real problem anyway.
20. Why sacrifice the Temple and a nation for the failures of one man?
It didn’t make any sense. What made sense was getting rid of the threat before
it became any worse.
C.
MISSING THE BIG PICTURE
1. But there is something we must not miss. Notice that the Sanhedrin
says: Here is this man performing many
miraculous signs.
2. They didn’t say: Here is
this imposter. Here is this charlatan. Here is this conniver who had duped the
ignorant masses. Here is this lying deceiver.
3. No, they said: Here is this
man performing many miraculous signs.
4. They didn’t deny was Jesus was saying. They didn’t deny what Jesus
was doing. They didn’t deny that he had performed extraordinary miraculous
signs.
5. They denied nothing except what
it all meant. They were more concerned about their national identity and
their political power and their influence than they were with the remarkable
claims of Jesus Christ on their lives.
6. Jesus hadn’t come to lead a political rebellion. He’d come to save
the world from its sins—Jews and Romans included.
7. It’s a good warning to us. That we can actually reject Jesus’
claims on our lives because we prefer our own agenda. Our own cause. Our own
plans. Our own ideas.
8. It’s frightening to see how otherwise intelligent and astute
people could miss something so obvious. How they could settle for the short
term solution and miss the permanent one. But they did. People do it all the
time.
9. For us disciples the lesson is similar. That we must be on our
guard that we don’t fail to follow Jesus’ lead as our Master because we prefer
our own agenda.
10. Of course, we don’t try to get rid of him. That’s not an option we
have or want. But sometimes effectively we act as if he wasn’t around. That his way doesn’t matter.
11. But it does. It always does. And coming to the Lord’s Table is a
good time to reflect on it. And to not make the same error that the Jewish
leaders made.
12. The error of missing God’s big picture to preserve the agenda of
our little picture.